The statements may fail in having incoherent premises/conclusions (meaning it may be non-sequitur/unsound). However, word salad can form one or more of the premises/conclusions of arguments by gibberish. The argument by gibberish differs from word salad in that word salad may or may not be part of an argument. P2: Angels are sometimes blue because pixies are sometimes lazy depending on their moodĬ: Therefore angels are sometimes the sky P1: A valid proposition (or potentially a nonsense sentence). The form of the argument by gibberish is: Because the argument by gibberish is nonsensical, it may also try to rely on an appeal to emotion by verbal inflection, shouting, or use of emotive phrases (e.g., "Hell, I was born here!") that are tangential to the argument. An argument by gibberish is a formal fallacy and is a type of non sequitur. Charles Manson during his 1987 NBC interview.Īn argument by gibberish is one that relies on nonsense, inscrutable words, or impenetrable jargon, i.e. Begep flagaggle vaggle veditch-waggle bagga? “ ”Do you feel blame? Are you mad? Uh, do you feel like wolf kabob Roth vantage? Gefrannis booj pooch boo jujube bear-ramage.
0 kommentar(er)
